 My online identity is pretty diverse.  Each different facet seems to interact with a large web or sphere of somewhat similar individuals.  What surprises me, though, is how little the various spheres tend to interact with the other spheres.
My online identity is pretty diverse.  Each different facet seems to interact with a large web or sphere of somewhat similar individuals.  What surprises me, though, is how little the various spheres tend to interact with the other spheres. For instance, I see very little overlap between these three spheres: math teachers, programmers, and technology in education experts. All three of those spheres accept me and allow me to contribute and ask questions--and yet I know very few individuals that exist in even two of those three spheres.
For instance, take a look at this recent post about a probability question on a programming blog. The immense number of comments arguing one solution over another reminded me of the Monty Hall problem, which is taught in IMP 3 Math. In fact, there's almost nothing in those comments (other than the occasional coded "solution" to the problem) that would tell you that these are primarily programmers--not math teachers--arguing their view of the problem.
I found the comments amusing. I haven't necessarily found that being a natural at math makes a student a natural at programming--although I must say that almost all of my best programmers are very good at math. I've done research on a correlation between language acquisition aptitude and programming ability, but the results, of course, were unclear. What I do know, though, is that very few programmers (aside from a few Linquistics experts) ever think much about language acquisition.
Let the fun begin:
Let's say, hypothetically speaking, you met someone who told you they had two children, and one of them is a girl. What are the odds that person has a boy and a girl?
 
 
 
5 comments:
Is having a boy and a girl the same as having a girl and a boy?
I'm reading this as "Given two children and one is a girl, what is the probability the other is a boy."
Assuming that the birth of a girl is as equally likely as the birth of a boy:
BB
BG
GB
GG
Four combinations (order doesn't matter). So, given one of the two is a girl, the probability of the other being a boy is 2/3.
No?
Yes. IMP teachers rule.
I got it right also, but it's still fun to look at 1000+ comments arguing various solutions on the Coding Horror blog.
Well, in my house it was
BOY
BOY
BOY
BOY
Go figure.
:)
Yay!
I love the amount of probability in IMP. Last year we rearranged year 1 and moved Pig to the end of the year. It got shortchanged and I wasn't happy. I'm hoping to fix that this year.
(And I actually credit coaching math team with my love of probability. IMP is fairly new for us).
Nephews:
Boy
Boy
Boy
Boy
Boy
Boy
Grandchildren:
Boy
Boy
Girl! Yes! Finally!
Post a Comment